US to Iraq: ‘Vote All You Want, We’re Not Leaving!’

by Contributing Author | Jan 14, 2020 | Headline News, Ron Paul | 9 comments

[dipl_text_animator animated_text=”Do you LOVE America? | Do you WANT our borders secured? | Don’t miss on the latest news | Subscribe and stay informed!” animation_layout=”zoom” animation_time=”740ms” animation_hold=”5010ms” _builder_version=”4.24.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_text_settings_text_align=”center” global_text_settings_text_color=”#FFFFFF” global_colors_info=”{}”][/dipl_text_animator]
[contact-form-7 id=”6521033″ title=”Article Subscribe”]

Share

This article was originally published by Ron Paul at The Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity. 

President Trump’s decision earlier this month to assassinate Iran’s top military general on Iraqi soil – over the objection of the Iraqi government – has damaged the US relationship with its “ally” Iraq and set the region on the brink of war. Iran’s measured response – a few missiles fired on an Iraqi base after advance warning was given – is the only reason the US is not mired in another Middle East war.

Trump said his decision to assassinate Gen. Qassim Soleimani was intended to prevent a war, not start a war. But no one in his right mind would think that killing another country’s top military leader would not leave that country annoyed, to say the least. Senators Mike Lee (R-UT) and Rand Paul (R-KY) said the Trump Administration’s briefing to Congress on its evidence to back up claims that Soleimani was about to launch attacks against the US was among the worst briefings they’d ever attended.

After initially claiming that Soleimani had to be taken out immediately because of the “imminent” attacks he was launching against the US, Trump Administration officials including Secretary of State Pompeo and Defense Secretary Esper have been busy walking back those claims. Esper claimed over the weekend that he had not seen the intelligence suggesting an attack on US embassies was in the works. If the Secretary of Defense did not see the intelligence, then who did?

No doubt the Iraqi leadership recognized these kinds of deceptions: the same kinds of lies were used to push the US into attacking their own country in 2003. So it should not have come as a big surprise that the Iraqi government met last week and voted that all foreign military personnel should leave Iraqi soil.

Then a funny thing happened when the Iraqi prime minister attempted to communicate to the US government the will of the Iraqi people through their democratically-elected officials. On Thursday Iraqi Prime Minister Mahdi phoned Pompeo to urgently request that Washington enact a US troop “withdrawal mechanism” in Iraq. American troops are in Iraq by invitation of the Iraqi government and the Iraqi government had just voted to revoke that invitation.

The State Department responded with a statement titled “The US Continued Partnership with Iraq,” in which it essentially said that the US would not abide by the request of its Iraqi partners because the US military is a “force for good” in the Middle East and that as such it is “our right” to maintain “appropriate force posture” in the region.

The US invaded Iraq based on Bush Administration lies and a million Iraqis died as a result. Later, President Obama ramped up the drone program and also backed al-Qaeda affiliated terrorists to overthrow the secular Syrian government. Obama also attacked Libya based on lies, leaving the country totally destroyed. Trump is assassinating foreign officials and threatening the destruction of Iran.

And the State Department calls that a “force for good”?

The United States can be a true force for good, however. End the military occupation of the Middle East, end foreign military aid, stop using the CIA to overthrow governments. Allow Americans to travel and do business in any country they wish. Lead by example and demonstrate how free markets and peace benefit all. A “force for good” means not forcing others to bow to your will.

[the_ad_group id=”24571″]

URGENT ON GOLD… as in URGENT

It Took 22 Years to Get to This Point

Gold has been the right asset with which to save your funds in this millennium that began 23 years ago.

Free Exclusive Report

The inevitable Breakout – The two w’s

[email-download download_id=”345496″ contact_form_id=”19fc5e7″]

Related Articles

[the_ad_group id=”30340″]

Comments

Join the conversation!

It’s 100% free and your personal information will never be sold or shared online.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Commenting Policy:

Some comments on this web site are automatically moderated through our Spam protection systems. Please be patient if your comment isn’t immediately available. We’re not trying to censor you, the system just wants to make sure you’re not a robot posting random spam.

This website thrives because of its community. While we support lively debates and understand that people get excited, frustrated or angry at times, we ask that the conversation remain civil. Racism, to include any religious affiliation, will not be tolerated on this site, including the disparagement of people in the comments section.

[dipl_ajax_search search_placeholder=”Article Search” display_fields=”on|on|off|off” search_result_box_bg_color=”#870404″ search_icon_font_size=”20px” search_icon_color=”#870404″ loader_color=”#870404″ _builder_version=”4.17.4″ _module_preset=”default” search_result_item_title_font_size=”14px” search_result_item_excerpt_font_size=”11px” border_color_all_form_field=”#870404″ global_colors_info=”{}”][/dipl_ajax_search]

[the_ad_group id=”30343″]

[the_ad_group id=”30344″]

[620studio_custom_posts post_type=”report” columns=”1″ limit=”1″ category_id=”23503″ caption=”no” date=”no” title=”no”]