Pfizer Says Get A Third Shot Of Their “Vaccine” To “Neutralize” The Mild Omicron

by Mac Slavo | Dec 8, 2021 | Headline News | 9 comments

[dipl_text_animator animated_text=”Do you LOVE America? | Do you WANT our borders secured? | Don’t miss on the latest news | Subscribe and stay informed!” animation_layout=”zoom” animation_time=”740ms” animation_hold=”5010ms” _builder_version=”4.24.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_text_settings_text_align=”center” global_text_settings_text_color=”#FFFFFF” global_colors_info=”{}”][/dipl_text_animator]
[contact-form-7 id=”6521033″ title=”Article Subscribe”]

Share

Big Pharma’s main COVID-19 beneficiary, Pfizer, says that you should all roll up your sleeves for a third shot of their juice if you haven’t already. That’s because a third dose will “neutralize” the mild (and likely nonexistent) omicron scariant.

However, last night, data released out of South Africa showed that the Pfizer vaccine, supposedly the world’s gold standard in terms of COVID jabs, was less effective against the omicron variant than earlier variants of SARS-CoV-2. So why anyone would even consider another shot of something that has been proved to stop transmission or infection in the first place for something is mild if you “listen to the science” is beyond comprehension.

Have humans stooped so low when it comes to critical thinking that they cannot possibly process this in their minds? Anyone with at least some critical thinking skill can see this is all about getting these shots into people. Once the “vaccination” rates begin to lag, more scariants need to be invented to convince people to obey and comply with the orders of their masters.

And on Wednesday morning, Pfizer and its partner BioNTech pushed back by releasing data showing that three doses of their best-selling jab were effective enough to neutralize the omicron variant in lab tests (not in actual humans).

As the two companies scramble to produce an omicron-specific version of their jab, the data released this morning showed that a third dose increased antibodies as much as 25-fold compared with only two doses, the companies said. Still, two-doses may prove effective in preventing severe illness from COVID. –ZeroHedge

The (extremely preliminary) data released by Pfizer showed that companies’ early findings come a day after scientists in South Africa reported findings from early lab tests indicating the Pfizer jab generated only one-fortieth of the infection-fighting antibodies against omicron than against the original version of the virus. While omicron appears to be spreading rapidly, only preliminary data are available so far. And although researchers can’t say it for certain, it appears the new variant causes more mild infections than earlier variants, even if it is more transmissible. –ZeroHedge

The bottom line is that it becomes more apparent by the day that these shots are a part of the agenda.  They need people to get these for some reason, and it cannot possibly be for our benefit.

[the_ad_group id=”24571″]

URGENT ON GOLD… as in URGENT

It Took 22 Years to Get to This Point

Gold has been the right asset with which to save your funds in this millennium that began 23 years ago.

Free Exclusive Report

The inevitable Breakout – The two w’s

[email-download download_id=”345496″ contact_form_id=”19fc5e7″]

Related Articles

[the_ad_group id=”30340″]

Comments

Join the conversation!

It’s 100% free and your personal information will never be sold or shared online.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Commenting Policy:

Some comments on this web site are automatically moderated through our Spam protection systems. Please be patient if your comment isn’t immediately available. We’re not trying to censor you, the system just wants to make sure you’re not a robot posting random spam.

This website thrives because of its community. While we support lively debates and understand that people get excited, frustrated or angry at times, we ask that the conversation remain civil. Racism, to include any religious affiliation, will not be tolerated on this site, including the disparagement of people in the comments section.

[dipl_ajax_search search_placeholder=”Article Search” display_fields=”on|on|off|off” search_result_box_bg_color=”#870404″ search_icon_font_size=”20px” search_icon_color=”#870404″ loader_color=”#870404″ _builder_version=”4.17.4″ _module_preset=”default” search_result_item_title_font_size=”14px” search_result_item_excerpt_font_size=”11px” border_color_all_form_field=”#870404″ global_colors_info=”{}”][/dipl_ajax_search]

[the_ad_group id=”30343″]

[the_ad_group id=”30344″]

[620studio_custom_posts post_type=”report” columns=”1″ limit=”1″ category_id=”23503″ caption=”no” date=”no” title=”no”]